The Kinematic Composition of MgII Absorbers

The study of galaxy evolution using quasar absorption lines requires an understanding of what components of galaxies and their surroundings are contributing to the absorption in various transitions. This paper considers the kinematic composition of the class of 0.4 < z < 1.0 MgII absorbers, particularly addressing the question of what fraction of this absorption is produced in halos and what fraction arises from galaxy disks. We design models with various fractional contributions from radial infall of halo material and from a rotating thick disk component. We generate synthetic spectra from lines of sight through model galaxies and compare the resulting ensembles of MgII profiles with the 0.4 < z < 1.0 sample observed with HIRES/Keck. We apply a battery of statistical tests and find that pure disk and pure halo models can be ruled out, but that various models with rotating disk and infall/halo contributions can produce an ensemble that is nearly consistent with the data. A discrepancy in all models that we considered requires the existence of a kinematic component intermediate between halo and thick disk. The variety of MgII profiles can be explained by the gas in disks and halos of galaxies not very much different than galaxies in the local Universe. In any one case there is considerable ambiguity in diagnosing the kinematic composition of an absorber from the low ionization high resolution spectra alone. Future data will allow galaxy morphologies, impact parameters, and orientations, FeII/MgII of clouds, and the distribution of high ionization gas to be incorporated into the kinematic analysis. Combining all these data will permit a more accurate diagnosis of the physical conditions along the line of sight through the absorbing galaxy.Comment: 34 pages including 14 postscript figures; Accepted by the Astrophysical Journal; URL http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/cwc/pubs.htm

Effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of comparative studies using microarrays

Many biomedical experiments are carried out by pooling individual biological samples. However, pooling samples can potentially hide biological variance and give false confidence concerning the data significance. In the context of microarray experiments for detecting differentially expressed genes, recent publications have addressed the problem of the efficiency of sample-pooling, and some approximate formulas were provided for the power and sample size calculations. It is desirable to have exact formulas for these calculations and have the approximate results checked against the exact ones. We show that the difference between the approximate and exact results can be large. In this study, we have characterized quantitatively the effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of microarray experiments for the detection of differential gene expression between two classes. We present exact formulas for calculating the power of microarray experimental designs involving sample pooling and technical replications. The formulas can be used to determine the total numbers of arrays and biological subjects required in an experiment to achieve the desired power at a given significance level. The conditions under which pooled design becomes preferable to non-pooled design can then be derived given the unit cost associated with a microarray and that with a biological subject. This paper thus serves to provide guidance on sample pooling and cost effectiveness. The formulation in this paper is outlined in the context of performing microarray comparative studies, but its applicability is not limited to microarray experiments. It is also applicable to a wide range of biomedical comparative studies where sample pooling may be involved.Comment: 8 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables; to appear in Bioinformatic

Preface: symposium on progressive politics

Introduction to a special issue of Political Studies Review, based on papers presented at a conference on ‘Progressivism: Past and Present’ held at Senate House in London on 3 July 2012

Fluid physics, thermodynamics, and heat transfer experiments in space

An overstudy committee was formed to study and recommend fundamental experiments in fluid physics, thermodynamics, and heat transfer for experimentation in orbit, using the space shuttle system and a space laboratory. The space environment, particularly the low-gravity condition, is an indispensable requirement for all the recommended experiments. The experiments fell broadly into five groups: critical-point thermophysical phenomena, fluid surface dynamics and capillarity, convection at reduced gravity, non-heated multiphase mixtures, and multiphase heat transfer. The Committee attempted to assess the effects of g-jitter and other perturbations of the gravitational field on the conduct of the experiments. A series of ground-based experiments are recommended to define some of the phenomena and to develop reliable instrumentation

On the Spatial and Kinematic Distributions of Mg II Absorbing Gas in <z>=0.7 Galaxies

(Abridged) We present HIRES/Keck spectra having resolution 6 km/s of Mg II 2796 absorption profiles which arise in the gas associated with 15 identified galaxies over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 0.9. Using non-parametric rank correlation tests, we searched for correlations of the absorption strengths, saturation, and line-of-sight kinematics with the galaxy redshifts, rest frame B and K luminosities, rest colors, and impact parameters D. We found no correlations at the 2.5-sigma level between these properties. Of primary significance is the fact that the QSO-galaxy impact parameter apparently does not provide the primary distinguishing factor by which absorption properties can be characterized. The galaxy absorption properties exhibit a large scatter, which, we argue, is suggestive of a picture in which the gas arises from a variety of on-going dynamical events. Inferences from our study include: (1) The spatial distribution of absorbing gas in galaxies does not appear to follow a simple galactocentric functional dependence. (2) A single systematic kinematic model apparently cannot describe the observed velocity spreads in the absorbing gas. It is more that a heterogeneous population of sub-galaxy scale structures are giving rise to the observed cloud velocities. (3) The absorbing gas spatial distribution and kinematics may depend upon gas producing events and mechanisms that are recent to the epoch at which the absorption is observed. These distributions likely change over a few Gyr timescale. Based upon these inferences, we note that any evolution in the absorption gas properties over a larger redshift range should be directly quantifiable from a larger dataset of high-resolution absorption profiles.Comment: uuencoded: 22 pages, AASTeX file, 5 encapsulated PostScript figures; Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal; Also available for pick-up at http://www.ucolick.org/~cwc/qso/abstract.htm